What You Signed / Part 1: The deal
Your MCA is written as a sale of future sales, not a loan. What that means, the four numbers that describe it, and where to find them.
You signed a document that probably never uses the word "loan." On paper, you did not borrow anything. You sold something: a piece of your future sales, for cash today. That one idea explains almost everything else in your agreement.
A merchant cash advance, or MCA, is set up as a purchase. The funder pays you a lump sum. In return, you agree to hand over a fixed dollar amount from your future sales. The contract may call it a "purchase of future receivables," a "sale of future receipts" or something close to it. Whatever the name, there are four numbers that matter.
You do not usually pay the percentage directly. Instead the funder takes a fixed debit from your bank account, daily or weekly. That number was picked at signing as the funder's best guess at the specified percentage of your sales. Lesson 3 is about the gap between the guess and what actually happens.
Loans are covered by limits on interest rates, often called usury laws. Sales are not. That is a big reason MCAs are written as sales. The idea is that the funder takes a real risk: if your sales slow down, the payments should slow down too.
Courts have sometimes asked whether an MCA behaves like a sale or like a loan. In New York, they tend to look at three questions:
These are factors, not a checklist. Judges weigh them together. In a 2020 decision, a New York appellate court found a triable question about whether an agreement was a usurious loan, partly because the reconciliation clause let the funder adjust payments "at its sole discretion." In a 2022 decision, another appellate ruling went the funder's way. The court looked at the reconciliation provision, the finite term and the bankruptcy terms, and found a true sale.
It does not say your MCA is a loan, or that any court will treat it as one. Funders have won many of these cases. A court question about your agreement is for a lawyer to raise, usually as a defense. It is not a reason to skip a payment.
Press Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on a Mac) in your PDF and search for:
purchase price purchased amount specified percentage receipts sale of reconcil bankrupt
The money terms are usually in a summary box on page 1 or 2. The sale language sits in the first numbered section, often "Sale of Future Receipts." The three court questions live in three places: the reconciliation section, the term section and the events-of-default section.
Here is a made-up deal from "Funder A." Every number below is worked out from the first four, so you can check the math yourself.
Three things stand out. First, the factor rate of 1.35 sounds like 35%, but it is a multiplier on a short deal, and the real cost is higher once fees are counted. You will see how much higher in lesson 2. Second, the cash that lands in the account is $48,250, not $50,000, because $1,750 in fees came out first. Lesson 5 takes the fees apart.
Third, look at the last row. A fixed debit of $535.71 a day adds up to $11,250 a month. If that is meant to be 12% of your sales, then the funder assumed you would have $93,750 in sales every month. If your real sales are lower, the same debit takes a bigger share. That is the gap the rest of the course keeps coming back to.
$67,500. That is $50,000 times 1.35.
No. Courts can look past the label. In New York they have asked whether the reconciliation provision is real, whether the term is finite and whether the funder keeps its claim if the business goes bankrupt. Judges weigh these together.
No. It is a legal argument that a lawyer raises, usually as a defense. Skipping payments on your own can be a default.
Get all 12 + the workbook for $49 (free with any FairMCA report).
Get the course for $49 →General education, not legal advice. Your agreement's exact words control. For legal questions about your agreement, talk to a lawyer.